https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298907 The Competition Commission of India determined that the Opposite Party (OP) potentially abused its dominant position by imposing unfair conditions in its Continuing Professional Education (CPE) scheme, which restricted external organizations from conducting seminars and limited consumer choice. The Commission identified the OP as an 'enterprise' engaging in commercial activities and noted that its exclusive control over CPE seminar organization could violate Section 4 of the Competition Act, 2002. Consequently, the Commission ordered an investigation by the Director General to examine the alleged anti-competitive practices, emphasizing that this directive does not reflect a final opinion on the case's merits. en-us Fri, 28 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 27 Nov 2021 08:45:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298907 The Competition Commission of India determined that the Opposite Party (OP) potentially abused its dominant position by imposing unfair conditions in its Continuing Professional Education (CPE) scheme, which restricted external organizations from conducting seminars and limited consumer choice. The Commission identified the OP as an 'enterprise' engaging in commercial activities and noted that its exclusive control over CPE seminar organization could violate Section 4 of the Competition Act, 2002. Consequently, the Commission ordered an investigation by the Director General to examine the alleged anti-competitive practices, emphasizing that this directive does not reflect a final opinion on the case's merits. Case-Laws Law of Competition Fri, 28 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298907