https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298920 A criminal revision against conviction was held not maintainable where the convicted applicant had not surrendered, remained absconding, and had already suffered dismissal of the appeal. The High Court applied Chapter 10 Rule 48 of the Madhya Pradesh High Court Rules, 2008, which requires a declaration that the convicted person is in custody or has surrendered after conviction unless the sentence has been suspended. Because the defect went to the root of maintainability, the revision could not be entertained until the applicant complied with the surrender requirement. en-us Tue, 02 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 27 Nov 2021 08:45:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298920 A criminal revision against conviction was held not maintainable where the convicted applicant had not surrendered, remained absconding, and had already suffered dismissal of the appeal. The High Court applied Chapter 10 Rule 48 of the Madhya Pradesh High Court Rules, 2008, which requires a declaration that the convicted person is in custody or has surrendered after conviction unless the sentence has been suspended. Because the defect went to the root of maintainability, the revision could not be entertained until the applicant complied with the surrender requirement. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 02 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298920