https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298905 Revisional interference with an acquittal at the instance of a private complainant is confined to exceptional cases such as manifest illegality, glaring procedural defect, gross miscarriage of justice, or wrongful exclusion of admissible evidence; it cannot be used indirectly to bypass the bar on converting an acquittal into a conviction by ordering a retrial on a mere reappreciation of evidence. Under section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act, so much of an accused's information in police custody as distinctly relates to the discovery is admissible, and where the statement is integral to the recovery, the whole discovery-linked statement may be admissible. The commentary states that wrongly excluded admissible recovery evidence justified setting aside the acquittal and remitting the matter for rehearing. en-us Wed, 25 Jul 1962 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 26 Nov 2021 17:31:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298905 Revisional interference with an acquittal at the instance of a private complainant is confined to exceptional cases such as manifest illegality, glaring procedural defect, gross miscarriage of justice, or wrongful exclusion of admissible evidence; it cannot be used indirectly to bypass the bar on converting an acquittal into a conviction by ordering a retrial on a mere reappreciation of evidence. Under section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act, so much of an accused's information in police custody as distinctly relates to the discovery is admissible, and where the statement is integral to the recovery, the whole discovery-linked statement may be admissible. The commentary states that wrongly excluded admissible recovery evidence justified setting aside the acquittal and remitting the matter for rehearing. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 25 Jul 1962 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298905