https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298902 Order III Rule 1 CPC permits a recognised agent to appear and act for a party, but that authority does not extend to giving evidence on personal acts and personal knowledge of the principal. In execution proceedings alleging wilful disobedience of an injunction and seeking arrest or civil detention, the issue turns on the judgment debtor's own conduct. Because the alleged breach is personal in nature and within the debtor's knowledge, explanation and proof must come from that person. A power of attorney holder cannot depose in place of the principal on those personal matters and cannot represent the judgment debtor for defending such execution proceedings. en-us Fri, 22 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 26 Nov 2021 17:18:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298902 Order III Rule 1 CPC permits a recognised agent to appear and act for a party, but that authority does not extend to giving evidence on personal acts and personal knowledge of the principal. In execution proceedings alleging wilful disobedience of an injunction and seeking arrest or civil detention, the issue turns on the judgment debtor's own conduct. Because the alleged breach is personal in nature and within the debtor's knowledge, explanation and proof must come from that person. A power of attorney holder cannot depose in place of the principal on those personal matters and cannot represent the judgment debtor for defending such execution proceedings. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 22 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298902