<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (11) TMI 883 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415102</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the deduction of interest paid under Section 57(iii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The court emphasized the limited jurisdiction of the tribunal in disallowing interest expenditure and held that the tribunal had overstepped its authority by disallowing the entire interest expenditure. As a result, the court quashed the tribunal&#039;s order and allowed the appeal in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Aug 2022 18:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=662071" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (11) TMI 883 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415102</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the deduction of interest paid under Section 57(iii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The court emphasized the limited jurisdiction of the tribunal in disallowing interest expenditure and held that the tribunal had overstepped its authority by disallowing the entire interest expenditure. As a result, the court quashed the tribunal&#039;s order and allowed the appeal in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415102</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>