<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (11) TMI 873 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415092</link>
    <description>Transfer-pricing adjustments on intra-group services were deleted where the services were used in the telecom business, the same facts had been accepted in earlier years, and TNMM benchmarking had already been upheld; the royalty adjustment was remanded for fresh comparability analysis with disclosure of benchmarking material. Circuit accruals and year-end accruals, supported by a consistent mercantile basis and later utilisation or reversal, were deleted. Support service expenditure was remanded for verification of actual receipt of services. Annual revenue-share licence fee and lease line charge disallowance were deleted as revenue/business expenditure issues. Education cess was held deductible as business expenditure because it is not equated with tax for the disallowance provision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2021 10:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=662061" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (11) TMI 873 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415092</link>
      <description>Transfer-pricing adjustments on intra-group services were deleted where the services were used in the telecom business, the same facts had been accepted in earlier years, and TNMM benchmarking had already been upheld; the royalty adjustment was remanded for fresh comparability analysis with disclosure of benchmarking material. Circuit accruals and year-end accruals, supported by a consistent mercantile basis and later utilisation or reversal, were deleted. Support service expenditure was remanded for verification of actual receipt of services. Annual revenue-share licence fee and lease line charge disallowance were deleted as revenue/business expenditure issues. Education cess was held deductible as business expenditure because it is not equated with tax for the disallowance provision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415092</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>