<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (11) TMI 867 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415086</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that the advertisement services were related to trading of packaging material, not packaging machinery. Therefore, the demand for CENVAT Credit related to advertisement services attributed to packaging machinery was deemed incorrect. The impugned order was set aside, and the matter was remanded for reconsideration. The appeal was allowed for remand to the adjudicating authority for further review.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Nov 2021 09:18:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=662055" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (11) TMI 867 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415086</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that the advertisement services were related to trading of packaging material, not packaging machinery. Therefore, the demand for CENVAT Credit related to advertisement services attributed to packaging machinery was deemed incorrect. The impugned order was set aside, and the matter was remanded for reconsideration. The appeal was allowed for remand to the adjudicating authority for further review.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415086</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>