<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 1939 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298889</link>
    <description>The stay applications became infructuous as the Revenue had already recovered the demand, leading to the appeals being heard on merits. The undisclosed income from significant deposits in a bank account was added to the assessee&#039;s income. The Tribunal ruled that only the profit element from undisclosed sales should be taxed, applying a 10% GP to the income for the assessment years 2009-10 to 2011-12, partially allowing the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Nov 2021 09:18:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=662052" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 1939 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298889</link>
      <description>The stay applications became infructuous as the Revenue had already recovered the demand, leading to the appeals being heard on merits. The undisclosed income from significant deposits in a bank account was added to the assessee&#039;s income. The Tribunal ruled that only the profit element from undisclosed sales should be taxed, applying a 10% GP to the income for the assessment years 2009-10 to 2011-12, partially allowing the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298889</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>