<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 1938 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298888</link>
    <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the disallowance of expenses under section 14A r.w.r. 8D for A.Y. 2012-13. The tribunal held that since no exempt income was earned during the year and the appellant had adequate interest-free funds exceeding the investments, no disallowance under section 14A was justified. The decision was based on established legal principles and precedents from various High Courts, resulting in the allowance of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Nov 2021 09:18:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=662051" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 1938 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298888</link>
      <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the disallowance of expenses under section 14A r.w.r. 8D for A.Y. 2012-13. The tribunal held that since no exempt income was earned during the year and the appellant had adequate interest-free funds exceeding the investments, no disallowance under section 14A was justified. The decision was based on established legal principles and precedents from various High Courts, resulting in the allowance of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298888</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>