https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298891 The court emphasized the importance of procedural fairness and adherence to principles of natural justice in adjudicating proceedings, particularly regarding reliance on witness statements not available for cross-examination. The revenue was directed to clarify their position on the issue within four weeks, with the petitioner given two weeks to respond. The court allowed proceedings to continue but prohibited the adjudicating authority from issuing final orders until the matter was resolved. The judgment aimed to uphold the integrity of the adjudication process and prevent decisions based on uncertain facts. en-us Thu, 21 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 26 Nov 2021 09:18:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298891 The court emphasized the importance of procedural fairness and adherence to principles of natural justice in adjudicating proceedings, particularly regarding reliance on witness statements not available for cross-examination. The revenue was directed to clarify their position on the issue within four weeks, with the petitioner given two weeks to respond. The court allowed proceedings to continue but prohibited the adjudicating authority from issuing final orders until the matter was resolved. The judgment aimed to uphold the integrity of the adjudication process and prevent decisions based on uncertain facts. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 21 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298891