https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298887 A consent decree embodying compromise terms could not be varied unilaterally by extending instalment deadlines without the decree-holder's consent. Order 20 Rule 11(2) permits post-decree instalments only on the judgment-debtor's application and with the decree-holder's consent, while Sections 148 and 151 CPC cannot be used to override express compromise terms or defeat the agreed consequence of default. The recorded minutes were negotiated consent terms, so the decree was a consent decree under Order 23 Rule 3 CPC, not a decree on admission under Order 12 Rule 6 CPC. The agreed default clause remained binding and entitled execution of the full decree. en-us Mon, 08 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 25 Nov 2021 18:16:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298887 A consent decree embodying compromise terms could not be varied unilaterally by extending instalment deadlines without the decree-holder's consent. Order 20 Rule 11(2) permits post-decree instalments only on the judgment-debtor's application and with the decree-holder's consent, while Sections 148 and 151 CPC cannot be used to override express compromise terms or defeat the agreed consequence of default. The recorded minutes were negotiated consent terms, so the decree was a consent decree under Order 23 Rule 3 CPC, not a decree on admission under Order 12 Rule 6 CPC. The agreed default clause remained binding and entitled execution of the full decree. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 08 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298887