https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298886 A compromise decree under the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 did not create a fresh tenancy or continue landlord-tenant protection beyond Section 12(3); it only regulated enforcement of an existing eviction decree, so the tenant could not claim independent relief outside the statute. The clause postponing possession if arrears were paid by a stipulated date was not penal, because it merely conferred a concession that execution would be withheld on timely compliance and left the decree otherwise operative. On breach of the condition, the decree remained executable, and general relief against forfeiture under property law could not displace the special rent control scheme. en-us Thu, 13 May 1993 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 25 Nov 2021 18:08:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298886 A compromise decree under the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 did not create a fresh tenancy or continue landlord-tenant protection beyond Section 12(3); it only regulated enforcement of an existing eviction decree, so the tenant could not claim independent relief outside the statute. The clause postponing possession if arrears were paid by a stipulated date was not penal, because it merely conferred a concession that execution would be withheld on timely compliance and left the decree otherwise operative. On breach of the condition, the decree remained executable, and general relief against forfeiture under property law could not displace the special rent control scheme. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 13 May 1993 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298886