<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (10) TMI 1 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27205</link>
    <description>The court held that the conversion of a proprietary business into a partnership constituted a &quot;transfer&quot; triggering the forfeiture of development rebate under section 155(5) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court rejected the argument that a partnership firm could not be considered a &quot;person&quot; under the provision, emphasizing that a firm is a distinct assessable entity. The court affirmed the disallowance of development rebate for the relevant assessment years and awarded costs to the Department.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 15:05:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=66203" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (10) TMI 1 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27205</link>
      <description>The court held that the conversion of a proprietary business into a partnership constituted a &quot;transfer&quot; triggering the forfeiture of development rebate under section 155(5) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court rejected the argument that a partnership firm could not be considered a &quot;person&quot; under the provision, emphasizing that a firm is a distinct assessable entity. The court affirmed the disallowance of development rebate for the relevant assessment years and awarded costs to the Department.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27205</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>