<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (8) TMI 26 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27202</link>
    <description>Under the Land Acquisition Act, entitlement to compensation depended on when the award became operative and who was entitled to receive it on that date. The award signed on 9 November 1962 was effective only when announced on 15 December 1962, by which time the partnership firm had already come into existence. As a result, the acquisition compensation was attributable to the firm and not to the individual in his personal capacity.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 15:00:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=66200" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (8) TMI 26 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27202</link>
      <description>Under the Land Acquisition Act, entitlement to compensation depended on when the award became operative and who was entitled to receive it on that date. The award signed on 9 November 1962 was effective only when announced on 15 December 1962, by which time the partnership firm had already come into existence. As a result, the acquisition compensation was attributable to the firm and not to the individual in his personal capacity.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27202</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>