<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (11) TMI 854 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415073</link>
    <description>A valid notice under section 143(2) within the prescribed time was mandatory for a lawful assessment under the Income-tax Act, 1961. Because the notice in this search-related assessment was issued after the limitation period and the Department did not dispute that fact from the records, the jurisdictional defect went to the root of the assessment. The assessment was therefore void and unsustainable, so the additions did not require examination on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2021 07:57:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=661985" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (11) TMI 854 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415073</link>
      <description>A valid notice under section 143(2) within the prescribed time was mandatory for a lawful assessment under the Income-tax Act, 1961. Because the notice in this search-related assessment was issued after the limitation period and the Department did not dispute that fact from the records, the jurisdictional defect went to the root of the assessment. The assessment was therefore void and unsustainable, so the additions did not require examination on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415073</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>