<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (11) TMI 840 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL — MUMBAI BENCH—IV</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415059</link>
    <description>Section 7 CIRP initiation was unavailable where secured debenture documents required enforcement of an English mortgage through agreed contractual remedies before recourse to insolvency. The mortgage transferred secured property to the debenture trustee for debenture holders and provided for sale, appointment of a receiver, and reconveyance after satisfaction of secured obligations. Read with the statutory concept of an English mortgage, this structure required the creditor to proceed first against the mortgaged assets. Mere non-payment, without exhausting the agreed security-enforcement mechanism, did not constitute default for Section 7 purposes; the CIRP petition was therefore rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2021 07:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=661971" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (11) TMI 840 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL — MUMBAI BENCH—IV</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415059</link>
      <description>Section 7 CIRP initiation was unavailable where secured debenture documents required enforcement of an English mortgage through agreed contractual remedies before recourse to insolvency. The mortgage transferred secured property to the debenture trustee for debenture holders and provided for sale, appointment of a receiver, and reconveyance after satisfaction of secured obligations. Read with the statutory concept of an English mortgage, this structure required the creditor to proceed first against the mortgaged assets. Mere non-payment, without exhausting the agreed security-enforcement mechanism, did not constitute default for Section 7 purposes; the CIRP petition was therefore rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415059</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>