<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (11) TMI 835 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415054</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the impugned order and allowing the appeal with consequential relief. The decision was based on established legal positions and decisions regarding the inclusion of reimbursable expenses in the taxable value of services provided and the imposition of service tax, interest, and penalties. The Tribunal found that expenses like medical services, vehicles, accommodation, etc., need not be added to the assessable value for service tax payment, as per Supreme Court precedent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2021 07:56:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=661966" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (11) TMI 835 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415054</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the impugned order and allowing the appeal with consequential relief. The decision was based on established legal positions and decisions regarding the inclusion of reimbursable expenses in the taxable value of services provided and the imposition of service tax, interest, and penalties. The Tribunal found that expenses like medical services, vehicles, accommodation, etc., need not be added to the assessable value for service tax payment, as per Supreme Court precedent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415054</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>