<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (11) TMI 831 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415050</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the adjudicating authority to drop the service tax demands on the appellant for the period before 18.4.2006 and for Intellectual Property Right services received after 1.7.2012. The Tribunal ruled that the appellant was not liable to pay service tax under the reverse charge mechanism before 18.4.2016, based on precedents from the Hon&#039;ble Bombay High Court and the Hon&#039;ble Supreme Court. The appeal filed by the Revenue was dismissed, affirming the original authority&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2021 08:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=661962" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (11) TMI 831 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415050</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the adjudicating authority to drop the service tax demands on the appellant for the period before 18.4.2006 and for Intellectual Property Right services received after 1.7.2012. The Tribunal ruled that the appellant was not liable to pay service tax under the reverse charge mechanism before 18.4.2016, based on precedents from the Hon&#039;ble Bombay High Court and the Hon&#039;ble Supreme Court. The appeal filed by the Revenue was dismissed, affirming the original authority&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415050</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>