<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (11) TMI 828 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415047</link>
    <description>Rectification under Section 84 of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 is confined to mistakes apparent on the face of the record and cannot be used to reopen the substantive basis of a completed assessment. Where the assessment has attained finality, a rectification request that in substance seeks to bypass the statutory appellate remedy is not maintainable. The Madras High Court found no apparent error justifying exercise of rectification power and noted that the assessee had not challenged the assessment before the Appellate Commissioner within time. The rejection of the rectification request was therefore upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2021 07:56:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=661959" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (11) TMI 828 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415047</link>
      <description>Rectification under Section 84 of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 is confined to mistakes apparent on the face of the record and cannot be used to reopen the substantive basis of a completed assessment. Where the assessment has attained finality, a rectification request that in substance seeks to bypass the statutory appellate remedy is not maintainable. The Madras High Court found no apparent error justifying exercise of rectification power and noted that the assessee had not challenged the assessment before the Appellate Commissioner within time. The rejection of the rectification request was therefore upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415047</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>