https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415045 Criminal proceedings were found liable to be quashed in the exercise of inherent jurisdiction because the allegations were vague and unsupported by prompt complaint or specific particulars. The court noted substantial unexplained delay in setting the criminal law in motion, including a complaint filed long after the alleged incidents and after proceedings under the Negotiable Instruments Act had begun. As the charge sheet did not disclose clear details on entrustment, repayment, or documentary support, the material was treated as insufficient to sustain prosecution and the case was viewed as an abuse of process of law. en-us Tue, 16 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 25 Nov 2021 08:01:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415045 Criminal proceedings were found liable to be quashed in the exercise of inherent jurisdiction because the allegations were vague and unsupported by prompt complaint or specific particulars. The court noted substantial unexplained delay in setting the criminal law in motion, including a complaint filed long after the alleged incidents and after proceedings under the Negotiable Instruments Act had begun. As the charge sheet did not disclose clear details on entrustment, repayment, or documentary support, the material was treated as insufficient to sustain prosecution and the case was viewed as an abuse of process of law. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 16 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415045