<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (8) TMI 1251 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298875</link>
    <description>Out-of-turn hearing was permitted where the Tribunal found the appeals to be apparently covered by earlier judicial precedent. Although the Authorised Representative sought time to verify the effect of a later first appellate order in another dispute, the Tribunal exercised its discretion to dispose of the applications and directed the Registry to list the appeals for disposal on the specified date.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2021 07:56:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=661954" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (8) TMI 1251 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298875</link>
      <description>Out-of-turn hearing was permitted where the Tribunal found the appeals to be apparently covered by earlier judicial precedent. Although the Authorised Representative sought time to verify the effect of a later first appellate order in another dispute, the Tribunal exercised its discretion to dispose of the applications and directed the Registry to list the appeals for disposal on the specified date.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298875</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>