<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 2062 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298870</link>
    <description>Temporary permission to travel abroad during a pending criminal trial may be granted under the court&#039;s inherent powers where the accused&#039;s prior conduct is satisfactory and return can be secured through conditions. The High Court considered earlier permissions, compliance with imposed conditions, and the absence of misuse, while noting the State&#039;s apprehension that the petitioner might not return. It held that adequate safeguards could address that risk and set aside the refusal order. The petitioner was permitted to travel abroad on furnishing a personal bond and an undertaking to return by the stipulated date, with liberty to the trial court to impose further conditions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2021 07:55:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=661944" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 2062 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298870</link>
      <description>Temporary permission to travel abroad during a pending criminal trial may be granted under the court&#039;s inherent powers where the accused&#039;s prior conduct is satisfactory and return can be secured through conditions. The High Court considered earlier permissions, compliance with imposed conditions, and the absence of misuse, while noting the State&#039;s apprehension that the petitioner might not return. It held that adequate safeguards could address that risk and set aside the refusal order. The petitioner was permitted to travel abroad on furnishing a personal bond and an undertaking to return by the stipulated date, with liberty to the trial court to impose further conditions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298870</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>