https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298872 A writ court cannot grant ancillary relief under Article 226 after declining the main prayer to quash an FIR, and extraordinary bail-related directions under that provision are permissible only in rare and extreme cases supported by reasons. Here, the High Court refused to quash the FIR but still directed the Magistrate to enlarge the respondents on bail on filing of an application. That mandatory direction was held inconsistent with the governing law and was set aside. The matter was remanded for fresh consideration of bail in accordance with law after hearing both parties. en-us Tue, 10 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 25 Nov 2021 07:55:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298872 A writ court cannot grant ancillary relief under Article 226 after declining the main prayer to quash an FIR, and extraordinary bail-related directions under that provision are permissible only in rare and extreme cases supported by reasons. Here, the High Court refused to quash the FIR but still directed the Magistrate to enlarge the respondents on bail on filing of an application. That mandatory direction was held inconsistent with the governing law and was set aside. The matter was remanded for fresh consideration of bail in accordance with law after hearing both parties. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 10 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298872