<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (11) TMI 813 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415032</link>
    <description>The Court quashed and set aside the notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for Assessment year 2013-2014, as it was deemed a change of opinion rather than the discovery of new undisclosed material facts. The Court found that the reasons provided for reopening the assessment were an attempt to circumvent legal restrictions, leading to the decision in favor of the petitioner, invalidating the notice and any subsequent demands based on it.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Nov 2021 06:15:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=661903" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (11) TMI 813 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415032</link>
      <description>The Court quashed and set aside the notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for Assessment year 2013-2014, as it was deemed a change of opinion rather than the discovery of new undisclosed material facts. The Court found that the reasons provided for reopening the assessment were an attempt to circumvent legal restrictions, leading to the decision in favor of the petitioner, invalidating the notice and any subsequent demands based on it.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415032</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>