<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (5) TMI 10 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27192</link>
    <description>The High Court of Delhi addressed the assessment of M/s. Precision Metal Works and its partners for the assessment year 1964-65. The Court upheld the assessment on the firm&#039;s income, emphasizing that the sum surrendered by the partners should be taxed as their personal income, not added to the firm&#039;s income. The Court also ruled that penalty proceedings under sections 273 and 271(1)(c) for the partners were outside the Commissioner&#039;s jurisdiction. As a result, the assessment on the firm was upheld, and the initiation of penalty proceedings against the partners was deemed inappropriate. Each party was ordered to bear their own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 May 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 13:31:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=66190" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (5) TMI 10 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27192</link>
      <description>The High Court of Delhi addressed the assessment of M/s. Precision Metal Works and its partners for the assessment year 1964-65. The Court upheld the assessment on the firm&#039;s income, emphasizing that the sum surrendered by the partners should be taxed as their personal income, not added to the firm&#039;s income. The Court also ruled that penalty proceedings under sections 273 and 271(1)(c) for the partners were outside the Commissioner&#039;s jurisdiction. As a result, the assessment on the firm was upheld, and the initiation of penalty proceedings against the partners was deemed inappropriate. Each party was ordered to bear their own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 May 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27192</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>