<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (11) TMI 806 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415025</link>
    <description>Receipts from supply of software were treated as consideration for a copyrighted article, not a transfer of copyright, because the issue had already been covered by the assessee&#039;s earlier year decisions and the jurisdictional High Court&#039;s ruling. On that basis, the consideration was not characterised as royalty under the India-US tax treaty or section 9(1)(vi) of the Income-tax Act, but as business receipts. The software supply payments were therefore not taxable as royalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Nov 2021 06:14:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=661896" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (11) TMI 806 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415025</link>
      <description>Receipts from supply of software were treated as consideration for a copyrighted article, not a transfer of copyright, because the issue had already been covered by the assessee&#039;s earlier year decisions and the jurisdictional High Court&#039;s ruling. On that basis, the consideration was not characterised as royalty under the India-US tax treaty or section 9(1)(vi) of the Income-tax Act, but as business receipts. The software supply payments were therefore not taxable as royalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415025</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>