https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415019 The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the appointment of Respondent No.2 as Technical Member of NCLAT. The appointment was found to be valid and in compliance with the Companies Act, 2013. The court imposed costs on the petitioner for concealing facts and lacking standing to file the petition. en-us Tue, 09 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 24 Nov 2021 06:14:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415019 The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the appointment of Respondent No.2 as Technical Member of NCLAT. The appointment was found to be valid and in compliance with the Companies Act, 2013. The court imposed costs on the petitioner for concealing facts and lacking standing to file the petition. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 09 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415019