<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (11) TMI 784 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415003</link>
    <description>Unchallenged appellate refund orders that have attained finality bind the subordinate adjudicating authority and must be implemented. The principle of retrospective operation of judicial decisions was inapplicable because there was no pending rectification or live challenge capable of reopening the concluded proceedings. A direction by the Commissioner (Appeals) to recover refund already sanctioned under final Tribunal orders was therefore without authority and unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Nov 2021 06:13:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=661874" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (11) TMI 784 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415003</link>
      <description>Unchallenged appellate refund orders that have attained finality bind the subordinate adjudicating authority and must be implemented. The principle of retrospective operation of judicial decisions was inapplicable because there was no pending rectification or live challenge capable of reopening the concluded proceedings. A direction by the Commissioner (Appeals) to recover refund already sanctioned under final Tribunal orders was therefore without authority and unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415003</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>