<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (11) TMI 779 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414998</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, quashing all previous judgments and restoring the original arbitral award. The Court held that the arbitrator&#039;s modification, deviating from the original claim, was unjustified as it exceeded the permissible correction of arithmetical or clerical errors under Section 33 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The Court emphasized that Section 33 only allows corrections of such errors, making the modification unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Nov 2021 06:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=661869" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (11) TMI 779 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414998</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, quashing all previous judgments and restoring the original arbitral award. The Court held that the arbitrator&#039;s modification, deviating from the original claim, was unjustified as it exceeded the permissible correction of arithmetical or clerical errors under Section 33 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The Court emphasized that Section 33 only allows corrections of such errors, making the modification unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414998</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>