<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (11) TMI 778 - JAMMU &amp; KASHMIR HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414997</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petition seeking quashing of the building permission rejection, citing compliance with High Court orders protecting temple properties. The plea for deemed permission was rejected due to the pandemic&#039;s impact on limitation periods. The court found no merit in arguments regarding lease deed validity or necessity for leasing temple property. The writ petition was dismissed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2021 10:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=661868" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (11) TMI 778 - JAMMU &amp; KASHMIR HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414997</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petition seeking quashing of the building permission rejection, citing compliance with High Court orders protecting temple properties. The plea for deemed permission was rejected due to the pandemic&#039;s impact on limitation periods. The court found no merit in arguments regarding lease deed validity or necessity for leasing temple property. The writ petition was dismissed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414997</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>