https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414997 Clause 5.1 of the Srinagar Municipal Corporation (Building) Bye-laws, 2011 does not confer deemed building permission where the sixty-day refusal period was effectively excluded during the COVID-19 disruption and in light of Supreme Court limitation extensions. The petitioner therefore could not rely on delayed communication of refusal. The refusal order was also sustained because it recorded that the land belonged to Mandir Shiv Ji, no lease deeds were produced before the competent authority, and the property was already covered by earlier writ and contempt directions protecting religious property from encroachment and unauthorised interests. The challenge failed, and the writ petition was held to be without merit. en-us Mon, 15 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 23 Nov 2021 10:33:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414997 Clause 5.1 of the Srinagar Municipal Corporation (Building) Bye-laws, 2011 does not confer deemed building permission where the sixty-day refusal period was effectively excluded during the COVID-19 disruption and in light of Supreme Court limitation extensions. The petitioner therefore could not rely on delayed communication of refusal. The refusal order was also sustained because it recorded that the land belonged to Mandir Shiv Ji, no lease deeds were produced before the competent authority, and the property was already covered by earlier writ and contempt directions protecting religious property from encroachment and unauthorised interests. The challenge failed, and the writ petition was held to be without merit. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 15 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414997