https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414996 The right to travel abroad, including for family reunion and preservation of foreign residency status, was treated as part of personal liberty and family life, to be regulated by proportionate safeguards rather than denied outright. Pendency of earlier cancellation proceedings, alleged non-cooperation in investigation, and merits-based accusations were not sufficient on these facts to bar travel, and lapse of the originally sought dates did not defeat the request because the underlying cause continued to survive. Permission to travel was therefore granted subject to stringent conditions, including sureties, a fixed travel window, an undertaking to return, restrictions on further travel, and production of the passport on return. en-us Tue, 09 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 23 Nov 2021 12:54:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414996 The right to travel abroad, including for family reunion and preservation of foreign residency status, was treated as part of personal liberty and family life, to be regulated by proportionate safeguards rather than denied outright. Pendency of earlier cancellation proceedings, alleged non-cooperation in investigation, and merits-based accusations were not sufficient on these facts to bar travel, and lapse of the originally sought dates did not defeat the request because the underlying cause continued to survive. Permission to travel was therefore granted subject to stringent conditions, including sureties, a fixed travel window, an undertaking to return, restrictions on further travel, and production of the passport on return. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 09 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414996