<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (7) TMI 1205 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298856</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the findings of the enquiry officer and disciplinary authority. The appellant&#039;s explanation for disproportionate assets was deemed unsatisfactory, and the denial of legal assistance during the departmental enquiry was justified. The Court found no merit in the appellant&#039;s arguments regarding procedural fairness and natural justice, concluding that the enquiry was conducted fairly. The appeal was dismissed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Nov 2021 06:11:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=661864" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (7) TMI 1205 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298856</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the findings of the enquiry officer and disciplinary authority. The appellant&#039;s explanation for disproportionate assets was deemed unsatisfactory, and the denial of legal assistance during the departmental enquiry was justified. The Court found no merit in the appellant&#039;s arguments regarding procedural fairness and natural justice, concluding that the enquiry was conducted fairly. The appeal was dismissed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298856</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>