<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (4) TMI 573 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298854</link>
    <description>An insolvency notice under the Presidency-Towns Insolvency Act, 1909 could be founded on an adjudication and recovery certificate issued under the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 because the phrase &quot;decree or order&quot; in Section 9(2) was not confined to a civil court decree. The court rejected importing Civil Procedure Code definitions to narrow that language. It further held that the 1993 Act did not bar insolvency proceedings: insolvency is a proceeding in rem for the benefit of creditors as a class, and the special recovery code operated on a different plane without direct inconsistency. The insolvency notice was therefore sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2021 17:58:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=661851" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (4) TMI 573 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298854</link>
      <description>An insolvency notice under the Presidency-Towns Insolvency Act, 1909 could be founded on an adjudication and recovery certificate issued under the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 because the phrase &quot;decree or order&quot; in Section 9(2) was not confined to a civil court decree. The court rejected importing Civil Procedure Code definitions to narrow that language. It further held that the 1993 Act did not bar insolvency proceedings: insolvency is a proceeding in rem for the benefit of creditors as a class, and the special recovery code operated on a different plane without direct inconsistency. The insolvency notice was therefore sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298854</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>