<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (4) TMI 573 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298854</link>
    <description>The Court held that the Insolvency Act&#039;s interpretation of &quot;decree or order&quot; is not limited to civil court decrees. It determined that a recovery certificate from the Debt Recovery Tribunal qualifies as an executable order under the Act. The Court emphasized that insolvency proceedings benefit all creditors and do not impede the DRT&#039;s authority under the Recovery Act. Consequently, the Court dismissed the notice of motion, affirming the validity of the insolvency notice and highlighting the collective nature of insolvency proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2021 17:58:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=661851" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (4) TMI 573 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298854</link>
      <description>The Court held that the Insolvency Act&#039;s interpretation of &quot;decree or order&quot; is not limited to civil court decrees. It determined that a recovery certificate from the Debt Recovery Tribunal qualifies as an executable order under the Act. The Court emphasized that insolvency proceedings benefit all creditors and do not impede the DRT&#039;s authority under the Recovery Act. Consequently, the Court dismissed the notice of motion, affirming the validity of the insolvency notice and highlighting the collective nature of insolvency proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298854</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>