<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (10) TMI 811 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298851</link>
    <description>Anticipatory bail already granted can be cancelled only on very cogent and overwhelming grounds, such as misuse of the concession or perversity in the original order. The appellants had joined the investigation and were interrogated more than once, and the bail order had been passed on consideration of the relevant facts and reasons. The High Court set aside the grant and confirmation of bail without properly addressing the record or showing that the earlier discretion was erroneous. The cancellation was therefore unsustainable, and the orders cancelling bail were set aside while the benefit of anticipatory bail was restored to the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2021 12:36:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=661841" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (10) TMI 811 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298851</link>
      <description>Anticipatory bail already granted can be cancelled only on very cogent and overwhelming grounds, such as misuse of the concession or perversity in the original order. The appellants had joined the investigation and were interrogated more than once, and the bail order had been passed on consideration of the relevant facts and reasons. The High Court set aside the grant and confirmation of bail without properly addressing the record or showing that the earlier discretion was erroneous. The cancellation was therefore unsustainable, and the orders cancelling bail were set aside while the benefit of anticipatory bail was restored to the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298851</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>