<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (9) TMI 658 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298848</link>
    <description>Section 21 of the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 places primary responsibility for wage payment on the contractor, and the principal employer&#039;s liability arises only if the contractor fails to pay wages within the statutory definition. Rule 25(v)(a) of the Andhra Pradesh Contract Labour Rules, 1971 requires wage parity as a licence condition, but it does not create a separate statutory liability on the principal employer to meet any shortfall caused by breach of that condition. The additional wage amount remains recoverable from the contractor, while the principal employer&#039;s liability is confined to unpaid contractual wages.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2021 11:13:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=661837" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (9) TMI 658 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298848</link>
      <description>Section 21 of the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 places primary responsibility for wage payment on the contractor, and the principal employer&#039;s liability arises only if the contractor fails to pay wages within the statutory definition. Rule 25(v)(a) of the Andhra Pradesh Contract Labour Rules, 1971 requires wage parity as a licence condition, but it does not create a separate statutory liability on the principal employer to meet any shortfall caused by breach of that condition. The additional wage amount remains recoverable from the contractor, while the principal employer&#039;s liability is confined to unpaid contractual wages.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298848</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>