https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298847 Pendency of a corruption case and a bail-cancellation application, by itself, was not treated as sufficient reason to refuse a limited request to travel abroad when the petitioner was on bail and no interim adverse order had been passed in the cancellation proceedings. The Court relied on the presumption of innocence and the principle that an undertaking to return should ordinarily be accepted unless concrete material shows a risk of breach. As the refusal order did not properly address these considerations, it was set aside and permission to travel abroad for one month was granted subject to an undertaking and security to the trial Judge's satisfaction. en-us Thu, 10 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 23 Nov 2021 10:25:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298847 Pendency of a corruption case and a bail-cancellation application, by itself, was not treated as sufficient reason to refuse a limited request to travel abroad when the petitioner was on bail and no interim adverse order had been passed in the cancellation proceedings. The Court relied on the presumption of innocence and the principle that an undertaking to return should ordinarily be accepted unless concrete material shows a risk of breach. As the refusal order did not properly address these considerations, it was set aside and permission to travel abroad for one month was granted subject to an undertaking and security to the trial Judge's satisfaction. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 10 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298847