<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (6) TMI 912 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298837</link>
    <description>The Tribunal confirmed the order of the CIT(A) allowing the assessee&#039;s deduction u/s 80IA for profits from Kakinada, Jamnagar, and Dahej ports, despite the absence of agreements for operation and maintenance with specified authorities. The Tribunal emphasized that services rendered by the assessee were integral to port infrastructure, supporting partial project eligibility under section 80IA. Additionally, the Tribunal permitted the deduction for Dahej Port under section 80IA rather than section 33AC, aligning with prior decisions. The appeal by the Revenue was dismissed, underscoring the importance of a beneficial interpretation of tax laws for taxpayers.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2021 13:19:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=661785" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (6) TMI 912 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298837</link>
      <description>The Tribunal confirmed the order of the CIT(A) allowing the assessee&#039;s deduction u/s 80IA for profits from Kakinada, Jamnagar, and Dahej ports, despite the absence of agreements for operation and maintenance with specified authorities. The Tribunal emphasized that services rendered by the assessee were integral to port infrastructure, supporting partial project eligibility under section 80IA. Additionally, the Tribunal permitted the deduction for Dahej Port under section 80IA rather than section 33AC, aligning with prior decisions. The appeal by the Revenue was dismissed, underscoring the importance of a beneficial interpretation of tax laws for taxpayers.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298837</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>