<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (11) TMI 735 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL — BENGALURU BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414954</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the application filed by the minority shareholder, holding it devoid of merit and as an abuse of process. It concluded that the application was a proxy war to support another party in the main company petition. The Tribunal advised the applicant to approach the liquidator for any claims in the liquidation estate as per the law, with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2021 06:08:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=661749" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (11) TMI 735 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL — BENGALURU BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414954</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the application filed by the minority shareholder, holding it devoid of merit and as an abuse of process. It concluded that the application was a proxy war to support another party in the main company petition. The Tribunal advised the applicant to approach the liquidator for any claims in the liquidation estate as per the law, with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414954</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>