<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (11) TMI 728 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414947</link>
    <description>A contractual clause barring interest on earnest money, security deposit, and amounts payable to the contractor under the contract was held to exclude arbitral awards of pre-reference, pendente lite, and future interest. The phrase &quot;amounts payable to the contractor under the contract&quot; was treated as wide and independent, and not limited by ejusdem generis. Reading the clause with section 31(7)(a) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and the governing line of authority, the Court held that an arbitrator cannot award interest contrary to an express contractual bar. The award of pendente lite and future interest was therefore unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2021 06:07:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=661738" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (11) TMI 728 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414947</link>
      <description>A contractual clause barring interest on earnest money, security deposit, and amounts payable to the contractor under the contract was held to exclude arbitral awards of pre-reference, pendente lite, and future interest. The phrase &quot;amounts payable to the contractor under the contract&quot; was treated as wide and independent, and not limited by ejusdem generis. Reading the clause with section 31(7)(a) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and the governing line of authority, the Court held that an arbitrator cannot award interest contrary to an express contractual bar. The award of pendente lite and future interest was therefore unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414947</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>