<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (4) TMI 18 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27174</link>
    <description>The High Court held that reopening an assessment solely based on audit findings was not justified under section 147(b) of the Income-tax Act. It clarified that while the audit party cannot interpret the law, it can bring legal issues to the Income-tax Officer&#039;s attention, which constitutes valid &quot;information&quot; for reopening. The court emphasized the distinction between the source of law and its communication, highlighting the audit&#039;s role in identifying legal errors. Additionally, it ruled that the exemption under section 54 of the Income-tax Act does not apply to Hindu undivided families. The court allowed the Department&#039;s application, directing the Tribunal to address the question of law on the justification of reopening the assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 12:38:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=66172" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (4) TMI 18 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27174</link>
      <description>The High Court held that reopening an assessment solely based on audit findings was not justified under section 147(b) of the Income-tax Act. It clarified that while the audit party cannot interpret the law, it can bring legal issues to the Income-tax Officer&#039;s attention, which constitutes valid &quot;information&quot; for reopening. The court emphasized the distinction between the source of law and its communication, highlighting the audit&#039;s role in identifying legal errors. Additionally, it ruled that the exemption under section 54 of the Income-tax Act does not apply to Hindu undivided families. The court allowed the Department&#039;s application, directing the Tribunal to address the question of law on the justification of reopening the assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=27174</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>