<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 2061 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298813</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2010-11 due to income concealment by the firm engaged in advertisement contracts. The initial penalty of 200% of the tax sought to be evaded was deemed excessive and reduced to 100%. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was partially allowed, resulting in a modified penalty amount of Rs. 10,25,850.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Nov 2021 19:20:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=661713" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 2061 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298813</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2010-11 due to income concealment by the firm engaged in advertisement contracts. The initial penalty of 200% of the tax sought to be evaded was deemed excessive and reduced to 100%. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was partially allowed, resulting in a modified penalty amount of Rs. 10,25,850.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298813</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>