<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (11) TMI 723 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414942</link>
    <description>Furlough under the Bombay Furlough and Parole Rules, 1959 is a regulated discretionary release and not an absolute legal right, because the Rules use permissive language, set eligibility conditions, and expressly deny any enforceable entitlement. Refusal was also upheld where the competent authority had material suggesting a risk to public peace and tranquillity, including alleged threats to witnesses and officials, alleged attempts to influence persons connected with the case, and unsatisfactory conduct in custody. A prior furlough grant on different grounds did not prevent later refusal on fresh adverse material. The impugned grant was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Nov 2021 19:17:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=661705" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (11) TMI 723 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414942</link>
      <description>Furlough under the Bombay Furlough and Parole Rules, 1959 is a regulated discretionary release and not an absolute legal right, because the Rules use permissive language, set eligibility conditions, and expressly deny any enforceable entitlement. Refusal was also upheld where the competent authority had material suggesting a risk to public peace and tranquillity, including alleged threats to witnesses and officials, alleged attempts to influence persons connected with the case, and unsatisfactory conduct in custody. A prior furlough grant on different grounds did not prevent later refusal on fresh adverse material. The impugned grant was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414942</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>