https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298806 The appeal was dismissed, upholding the learned single Judge's decision. The court concluded that the plaintiff failed to substantiate her claim that the properties in the name of the 1st defendant were held benami for the family. The general presumption favored the 1st defendant, asserting that the properties were purchased for her benefit and welfare by her husband, Kesava Padayachi. The judgment and decree of the learned single Judge were sustained, and the plaintiff's appeal was dismissed without costs. en-us Mon, 10 Mar 1997 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 20 Nov 2021 16:27:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298806 The appeal was dismissed, upholding the learned single Judge's decision. The court concluded that the plaintiff failed to substantiate her claim that the properties in the name of the 1st defendant were held benami for the family. The general presumption favored the 1st defendant, asserting that the properties were purchased for her benefit and welfare by her husband, Kesava Padayachi. The judgment and decree of the learned single Judge were sustained, and the plaintiff's appeal was dismissed without costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 10 Mar 1997 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298806