https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298803 The court dismissed the plaintiff's recovery suit against the defendants, ruling it as barred by limitation. The plaintiff claimed the acknowledgment of liability by the defendants extended the limitation period, but the court found the acknowledgment was not in writing as required by the Limitation Act. Even if the acknowledgment was accepted, the suit would still be time-barred. The court allowed the defendants' application and dismissed the suit, with each party bearing their own costs, clarifying that the decision would not impact another suit pending before the Civil Judge, Delhi. en-us Fri, 13 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 20 Nov 2021 12:41:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298803 The court dismissed the plaintiff's recovery suit against the defendants, ruling it as barred by limitation. The plaintiff claimed the acknowledgment of liability by the defendants extended the limitation period, but the court found the acknowledgment was not in writing as required by the Limitation Act. Even if the acknowledgment was accepted, the suit would still be time-barred. The court allowed the defendants' application and dismissed the suit, with each party bearing their own costs, clarifying that the decision would not impact another suit pending before the Civil Judge, Delhi. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 13 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298803