<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (11) TMI 702 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414921</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the interest income in question did not belong to the assessee and was not taxable due to the overriding title in favor of DICGCI. The appeal was partly allowed on this technical issue, with other raised issues being dismissed as infructuous. The Tribunal decided against remitting the matter back to lower authorities, as the facts were sufficiently addressed in the record.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2021 21:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=661639" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (11) TMI 702 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414921</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the interest income in question did not belong to the assessee and was not taxable due to the overriding title in favor of DICGCI. The appeal was partly allowed on this technical issue, with other raised issues being dismissed as infructuous. The Tribunal decided against remitting the matter back to lower authorities, as the facts were sufficiently addressed in the record.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414921</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>