https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298794 A lookout circular and related travel restrictions against a person not shown to be an accused were held unsustainable because the executive instructions governing such measures contemplated use in cognizable offences and did not permit continued restraint without a lawful basis. The record showed that the person had already appeared before the investigating agency and had travelled abroad on earlier occasions without objection, while no material justified the continued restriction or brought the case within any recognised exceptional category. The writ court held that such executive action was subject to judicial review and granted relief, while leaving the investigating agency free to seek cooperation and proceed in accordance with law if incriminating material later emerged. en-us Thu, 08 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 20 Nov 2021 09:54:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298794 A lookout circular and related travel restrictions against a person not shown to be an accused were held unsustainable because the executive instructions governing such measures contemplated use in cognizable offences and did not permit continued restraint without a lawful basis. The record showed that the person had already appeared before the investigating agency and had travelled abroad on earlier occasions without objection, while no material justified the continued restriction or brought the case within any recognised exceptional category. The writ court held that such executive action was subject to judicial review and granted relief, while leaving the investigating agency free to seek cooperation and proceed in accordance with law if incriminating material later emerged. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 08 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298794