https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298795 Review jurisdiction is confined to narrow grounds, requiring a patent error on the face of the record or another basis comparable to Order 47 Rule 1 CPC. Mere disagreement with the earlier decision is insufficient, and interference is unavailable unless the applicant shows a clear ground within the limited scope of review. On the facts stated, no such error or permissible ground was established, so the review petitions did not warrant interference and were dismissed. en-us Fri, 23 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 20 Nov 2021 09:54:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298795 Review jurisdiction is confined to narrow grounds, requiring a patent error on the face of the record or another basis comparable to Order 47 Rule 1 CPC. Mere disagreement with the earlier decision is insufficient, and interference is unavailable unless the applicant shows a clear ground within the limited scope of review. On the facts stated, no such error or permissible ground was established, so the review petitions did not warrant interference and were dismissed. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 23 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298795