https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298785 The High Court affirmed the trial Court's decision to acquit the respondent in a case involving the dishonour of cheques under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The respondent successfully rebutted the presumption under Sections 118 and 139 by raising a probable defense during cross-examination. The appellant's failure to provide necessary evidence to support the loan claim led to the dismissal of the appeal, with the court holding that the burden of proof had not been discharged. en-us Tue, 10 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 20 Nov 2021 09:54:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298785 The High Court affirmed the trial Court's decision to acquit the respondent in a case involving the dishonour of cheques under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The respondent successfully rebutted the presumption under Sections 118 and 139 by raising a probable defense during cross-examination. The appellant's failure to provide necessary evidence to support the loan claim led to the dismissal of the appeal, with the court holding that the burden of proof had not been discharged. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 10 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298785