<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 2064 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298787</link>
    <description>The appeals stemmed from complaints under the Negotiable Instruments Act regarding dishonored cheques issued by the respondent to repay loans. While initial presumptions favored the appellant, the respondent&#039;s defense successfully rebutted these presumptions, leading to the dismissal of complaints and acquittal. The court emphasized the need for the appellant to prove foundational facts of the loan, considering discrepancies in evidence. Ultimately, the court upheld the trial court&#039;s decision, affirming the respondent&#039;s successful defense based on preponderance of probabilities, and dismissed the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Nov 2021 09:54:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=661608" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 2064 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298787</link>
      <description>The appeals stemmed from complaints under the Negotiable Instruments Act regarding dishonored cheques issued by the respondent to repay loans. While initial presumptions favored the appellant, the respondent&#039;s defense successfully rebutted these presumptions, leading to the dismissal of complaints and acquittal. The court emphasized the need for the appellant to prove foundational facts of the loan, considering discrepancies in evidence. Ultimately, the court upheld the trial court&#039;s decision, affirming the respondent&#039;s successful defense based on preponderance of probabilities, and dismissed the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298787</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>