https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298775 A writ petition under Article 32 was held not maintainable where the petitioner had already pursued the same substantive relief before the High Court through proceedings under the CrPC and Articles 226/227, and those proceedings remained pending. The Supreme Court treated the fresh petition as simultaneous invocation of parallel remedies on the same cause of action, and held that the availability of efficacious alternative proceedings, coupled with the pending High Court matter, amounted to abuse of process. The precedent cited on the Negotiable Instruments Act was found inapplicable to the maintainability issue. The petition was dismissed. en-us Tue, 10 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 19 Nov 2021 18:25:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298775 A writ petition under Article 32 was held not maintainable where the petitioner had already pursued the same substantive relief before the High Court through proceedings under the CrPC and Articles 226/227, and those proceedings remained pending. The Supreme Court treated the fresh petition as simultaneous invocation of parallel remedies on the same cause of action, and held that the availability of efficacious alternative proceedings, coupled with the pending High Court matter, amounted to abuse of process. The precedent cited on the Negotiable Instruments Act was found inapplicable to the maintainability issue. The petition was dismissed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 10 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298775